In a previous article, we have seen the existence of the legend of Krishna in the Indian subcontinent. His story to-day exists as a legend and mentioned in enough sources to convince a large amount of the populace of his actual life on Earth.
Now, let us explore this question: Was Krishna real or just a myth?
While trying to answer these questions, I’m certain we’ll also explore the answers to questions such as:
- When did Krishna live?
- Are the stories surrounding Krishna and his valour true?
- What was life like during the time of Krishna’s supposed existence?
As we have already seen, Krishna is regarding as an avatar of Vishnu, one of the three major gods of the Hindu pantheon, and highly reversed amongst Hindus for a long time – even to this day. The most obvious sources of his stories are The Mahabharata, the Harivamsa, and the Puranas (particularly The Bhagavata-Purana).

A current political map of India (Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Map-of-india-political-enlarge-view.gif)
Coming to actual historical sources, the legend of Krishna seems to be a combination of several other deities worshipped in ancient India, the earliest version being that of Vasudeva. Vasudeva was supposed to have been a hero-god belonging to the Vrishni tribe, one of their heroes – an attestation of this had been done by Panini in the 5th and the 6th centuries BCE and by an epigraphy in the 2nd century BCE Heliodorus pillar. He was said to be one of the Vrishni heroes.
The Vrishni heroes – also known as the Pancha-viras (literally meaning “five heroes”) – are a group of five heroes who were deified and worshipped with proves verfiable by archaeological and literary sources. According to these sources, the Vrishnis worshipped them near Mathura in 4th century BCE. Even coins and inscriptions in ancient India attest to their importance. The coins were discovered in the ruins of Ai-Khanoum or modern-day Afghanistan. Historians believe that perhaps at some point in time, the Vrishnis fused with the Yadava tribe, who had their own hero-god named Krishna. Eventually, Krishna and Vasudeva may have been fused together to form the deity Krishna we know to-day. Somewhere around the 4th century CE, the cult of Gopala-Krishna of the Abhiras was absorbed into this legend, making the newly formed Krishna as the protector of cattle.

Vāsudeva-Krishna, on a coin of Agathocles of Bactria, c. 180 BCE. This is “the earliest unambiguous image” of the deity.
More on the coins discovered in Afghanistan: It seems that in c. 180 BCE, Agathocles, an Indo-Greek king issued coins bearing deities that we interpret to-day as being that of Vaishnva imagery. (In case you were wondering, there was a time in the history of the Indian subcontinent when Greeks ruled parts of it. That’s a story for another day.) Some of these coins seemed to have represented Balarama with his pace and plow – two of the objects we associate with him to-day. Some also appeared with the images of Krishna with his typical Shankha (conch shell) and Sudarshana chakra (wheel).
Regarding the Heliodorus pillar: It was during the colonial era in India that a pillar was discovered by archaeologists in Besnagar (or Vidisha in Madhya Pradesh), perhaps dated between 125 and 100 BCE.

Heliodorus Pillar in the Indian state of Madhya Pradesh, erected about 120 BCE.
It was named after Heliodorus, an Indo-Greek ambassador of the Greek king, Antialcidas, to the Indian king, Kasiputra Bhagabhadra. The pillar was more fully excavated in the 1960s. It was identified to have been the foundations of a much larger ancient elliptical temple complex consisting of a sanctum, mandapas, and seven more pillars. The inscription on the Heliodorus pillar suggests that it is a private religious dedication by Heliodorus to the hero-god, Vasudeva. It refers to the king as “the Bhagavata Heliodorus” and that to the pillar itself as a Garuda pillar. What was the significance? The Bhagavata Purana is a text about Vaishnavism and Garuda is the eagle vehicle of Vishnu. Hence, both are associated with Krishna.
Dated in the 1st century BCE, the Hathibada Ghosundi inscriptions found near the state of Rajasthan in India also mention Balarama and Krishna. A stone slab that was found at a Mathura-Vrindavan archaeological site in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh has a Brahmi inscription, dated to the 1st century BCE. It mentions and even names the Pancha-viras of the Vrishni tribe. However, the first known depiction of the life of Krishna comes to us as late as the 1st and the 2nd centuries CE, on a relief found in Mathura. It seems that this relief shows Vasudeva carrying infant Krishna across the Yamuna River in a basket.
Hence, it is safe to assume at the moment that there is no concrete proof of Krishna’s real-life existence beyond the mythological legends and stories merged and passed on in stories and fairy tales.
That means, we did not get to answer our questions, either. I don’t know about you, but it is not very disappointing to me, since I have been expecting it. I would’ve known of a breakthrough on the Krishna legend if there ever really was a major one.
I hope this article has been satisfactory and that you shall keep coming to this blog for more updates on the events in History all across the world!
Sources:
You must be logged in to post a comment.